[Bug 665] Compiling the program statically

Kevin P. Fleming kpfleming at backtobasicsmgmt.com
Fri Sep 19 08:12:45 PDT 2003


Neven Has wrote:

> But maybe we should do the other way around -- making 620 a duplicate
> of this one?  I'm nitpicking here, I know :), just trying to make it
> clear.  After all, compiling program statically is what we would want
> to achieve.  620 (compiling the handlers in) will have to be done
> anyway.
> 

Yes, that makes more sense.




More information about the alfs-log mailing list