Kevin P. Fleming
kpfleming at backtobasicsmgmt.com
Fri Sep 19 09:39:49 PDT 2003
Neven Has wrote:
> Then they should all be set to CVS. :) These are all "initial" bugs
> from my todo lists and all apply to the latest version, now in CVS. I
> just don't want to change the version of each one alone, and spam the
> list again just for that, so I'm simply changing it when I do
> something else with a bug.
OK, makes sense.
> Well, instead of what I did for bug 619, maybe I should have just
> marked the bug as VERIFIED, after checking your patch. Then you, or
> somebody else would commit it to CVS and at that point CLOSE it?
> And if you can, you can close that bug now. :)
Done. I think that the plan should be the bug assignee posts their
patch to resolve the bug and changes the status to FIXED, someone else
does a code review/etc. and changes the status to VERIFIED, and then
either the bug assignee or the reviewer does the CVS commit and
changes status to CLOSED.
I haven't heard back yet on getting belgarath accounts/CVS access for
Vassili and myself yet, so as it stands today Neven is only one that
can do the CVS commit/change to CLOSED step. But any of us should be
able to do code review/change to VERIFIED.
More information about the alfs-log