Bugs priorities

James Robertson jwrober at linuxfromscratch.org
Sat Sep 20 13:33:44 PDT 2003

Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
> I think the process I outlined in my other message, being:
> assignee puts patch into buzilla and changes status to FIXED
> reviewer (other member of nALFS development team) reviews code and 
> either changes status to VERIFIED or back to ASSIGNED if additional work 
> is needed
> assignee or other code commit person commits patch to CVS and changes 
> status to CLOSED

OK, I saw your other message and this makes sense.  I think that over 
time, though, the LSB and our own testing team (for the book) will be 
major "customers" and will provide some excellent "from the trenches" 
bugs and or "that patch did not work" stuff.

> James, I currently can't accept ("assign") bugs to myself, except when I 
> enter them. Can this be changed?

Correct.  I got back word from Gerard about yours and Vassili's accounts 
on Belgarath.  This sould be handled soon and then we will get your 
@lfs.org accounts setup with everything you need.

Is this ok?

James Robertson -- jwrober at linuxfromscratch dot org
Reg. Linux User -- #160424 -- http://counter.li.org
Reg. LFS User   -- #6981   -- http://www.linuxfromscratch.org
LFS Bugzilla Maintainer    -- http://{blfs-}bugs.linuxfromscratch.org

More information about the alfs-log mailing list