Glibc problems

Chris Staub chris at
Wed Dec 28 08:29:04 PST 2005

Ken Moffat wrote:
>  Needless to say, the files installed from the sanitised headers and 
> binutils, and the logs for binutils, are identical (not surprising, 
> nothing has changed).  Diffing glibc between 20051024 and 20051107, 
> there are changes for the configure process, so perhaps something is 
> broken, or something got missed.
>  Plan A: try a newer snapshot, to see if this is fixed on x86.  If it 
> is, I'll need to try to isolate what has changed, I really don't want to 
> invite everybody to retest all architectures with a later glibc snapshot 
> if that can be avoided.
>  Plan B: maybe binutils-2.16.1 is now too old for glibc-head, at least 
> on x86.
>  I'd still appreciate a response to my earlier questions from anybody 
> who *has* built cross-lfs for x86 using glibc-20051107.
> Ken

I'm building a cross-lfs system right now, with glibc-20051107 - 
currently halfway through the final-system - and haven't had any 
problems. My LFS_HOST and LFS_TARGET are both i686-pc-linux-gnu.

More information about the cross-lfs mailing list