Santized Kernel Headers
dj at linuxfromscratch.org
Sun Jan 22 07:29:22 PST 2006
Jim Gifford wrote:
<snip fixincludes (seemingly unrelated)>
> Now for my questions, my answers are in the ()
> Do we really want to pursue our own creating of sanitized headers?
No...absolutely not. It's a PITA. However patching the files (what is
the count now, 4 or 5 files?) that need changes doesn't seem so bad.
What are the known issues agains the released version/cvs? What's been
done so far?
> Do we want to wait for LLH? (Could be a long time)
> Do we want use 2.4 headers with patches, like the distro's? (NO!, may
> loose some 2.6 ABI functionality)
As questioned in another post in this thread, in the past Mariusz has
been very receptive to patches.
> I have copied both the LFS-DEV list and Cross-LFS list, this has been a
> topic of some questions both in these lists and in IRC
> (yes I know, that's why I'm posting this message)
-- DJ Lucas
More information about the cross-lfs