ch-7.15 missing set +h?

John Gay johngay at
Mon Mar 27 00:21:04 PST 2006

On Tuesday 21 March 2006 10:41, Jim Gifford wrote:
> I'll have to look into it. I think part of it was due to the fact we are
> booting into an environment we built, no outside tainting. I'll go
> through my notes and let you know..
Glad to see this fix hit the book. I wasn't sure, but it seemed to me that we 
still needed it to build properly, and the last time I tried building, I 
forgot to set it and gcc failed make -k check for excessive errors. Guess 
I'll have to start over, again, again (Time for Telly Tubbies )


	John Gay

More information about the cross-lfs mailing list