[elinks-users] Re: Should ELinks use U+303F IDEOGRAPHIC HALF-FILL SPACE?
fonseca at diku.dk
Sun Nov 12 11:51:47 PST 2006
Kalle Olavi Niemitalo <kon at iki.fi> wrote Sun, Nov 12, 2006:
> Display U+303F rather than U+0020 if a double-cell character doesn't fit.
> I searched for ' ' and 32 and 0x20 and \x20, and replaced with
> UCS_ORPHAN_CELL wherever UCS_NO_CHAR was involved. However,
> this doesn't seem to suffice for BFU input fields.
Looks like the abstraction introduced by the patch would be nice to have
regardless of whether we move to use the new value or not.
More information about the elinks-users