[elinks-users] Re: Should ELinks use U+303F IDEOGRAPHIC HALF-FILL SPACE?

Kalle Olavi Niemitalo kon at iki.fi
Sun Nov 12 13:49:08 PST 2006

Jonas Fonseca <fonseca at diku.dk> writes:

> Looks like the abstraction introduced by the patch would be nice to have
> regardless of whether we move to use the new value or not.

OK, I'll commit it as (unicode_val_T) 0x20, and we can change it
to 0x303F later if a CJK user requests that.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 188 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/elinks-users/attachments/20061112/36a4ab8f/attachment.sig>

More information about the elinks-users mailing list