Proposal: integrate hints into the Wiki?
jeroen at linuxfromscratch.org
Tue Jun 8 15:59:40 PDT 2004
Jim Gifford said the following on 09-06-2004 00:33:
> I had made many points known about the wiki. Let me start the list over
> 1 - No way to get back to the home page once you have entered a page.
There's a global navigation list which can always be returned to. Also,
the logo is a link home.
> 2 - Debug Info, should not be on the page, It should only be for
Can be turned off very easily, however, the Wiki we're testing and which
this proposal was about does *not* display debug info by default.
> 3- Unmoderated, any can create an account and post, which is dangerous
> in this day and age.
Only if we choose to open it up for everyone. It is a *choice*, not a
mandatory feature. There are *lots* of restrictions possible, ranging
from free-for-all Wiki like (which I do *not* intend, as I have
specifically stated), to completely locked down like the current static
> 4 - The format doesn't make it easy to navigate.
A wiki or CMS does *not* impose *any* restrictions on navigation
capabilities; it's what implemented that counts! We can add global menus
and submenus just like the current site. We can also make them dynamic,
ie. an autogenerated sitemap, index, pages which link to the current
page, etc. If anything, the system allows a *lot* more navigation
capabilities and makes it easier for both users as editors!
> 5 - The wiki seems to be emulating the book format, so make it look like
> the book and the next previous and home to it
I don't know what this means. This is because the current wiki on
wiki.lfs.org was filled that way. It is no restriction of the Wiki or
the system I propose.
> I can go on and one, but I will stop at 5.
It seems your criticism is based on the current PhpWiki at
wiki.linuxfromscratch.org. That is *not* the system we intend to use on
the website, and it is also *not* the system which this proposal was
about. We're implementing TWiki at test.linuxfromscratch.org, and it has
none of the technical limitations which you point out above. In
contrary, it has all features that a regular CMS has, and all the
features that the current static HTML site has. But above that, it has
the *optional* freedoms of a Wiki system. Again, there *will* be
restrictions on page access and editing, although they are *not* necessary.
Please try to understand what I'm proposing here. I offer allmost 100%
identical features out of the box (we'll have to work on the tarballs),
but with CMS capacity and user maintenance. Do not be fooled or scared
by the word "Wiki" in here. Browse around on freedesktop.org, see what
features they have. We're implementing the same system. Read around on
www.twiki.org and judge it *after* you're familiar with the capacity of
the system. Thanks,
More information about the hints