No mailing list archives yet?

Jesse Tie Ten Quee highos at
Fri Mar 16 07:18:16 PST 2001


On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 09:51:57AM -0500, Gerard Beekmans wrote:
> That's correct it isn't, I didn't think it necessary. The only reason why we 
> would want to archive this list is to preserve the discussions. The only 
> discussions worth preserving are the ones that are not supposed to be held 
> here but on lfs-discuss (which is already being archived). Most of the emails 
> here anyways are from keystone which don't need archiving as you logon to 
> keystone to get the info.

hrm..well does it really matter? id prefer to have it online so it's
searchable, i hate having to search my mailbox's ;)

dunno, but that's just me, there still is discussion on this list
regardless on details, but anyways...

Jesse Tie Ten Quee - highos at highos dot com

More information about the lfs-book mailing list