Slip 89

Jesse Tie Ten Quee highos at
Mon May 7 13:28:52 PDT 2001


On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 03:44:47PM -0400, Gerard Beekmans wrote:
> Suppose we do branch. Changes are made to that branched version while
> MAIN stays nice and chilled. Then I see some good changes in the branch
> that I'd like to include in MAIN for that release. That would be a
> partial merge. Then a day later the same happens. I'd keep tagging and
> merging which I don't look forward to.

Well no, you don't want a branch to continue to long, it would be better
todo everything on the branch, then merge only once your done with the
release/on the branch.

There's no point of doing multiple merge's while the branch is still
alive, that kinda takes away the point of using branches, imho.

Jesse Tie Ten Quee - highos at highos dot com

More information about the lfs-book mailing list