cvs commit: LFS/FAQ why-not-package-management.xml

sklein at sklein at
Tue Jan 21 22:35:27 PST 2003

sklein      03/01/22 01:35:27

  Modified:    FAQ      why-not-package-management.xml
  slight improvements for the "can i install over" faqs
  Revision  Changes    Path
  1.8       +3 -2      LFS/FAQ/why-not-package-management.xml
  Index: why-not-package-management.xml
  RCS file: /home/cvsroot/LFS/FAQ/why-not-package-management.xml,v
  retrieving revision 1.7
  retrieving revision 1.8
  diff -u -r1.7 -r1.8
  --- why-not-package-management.xml	15 Jan 2003 19:09:15 -0000	1.7
  +++ why-not-package-management.xml	22 Jan 2003 06:35:27 -0000	1.8
  @@ -12,8 +12,9 @@
   <listitem><para>No package management is really necessary.
   Unless it is desirable to monitor package file placement minutely,
   any package large enough to warrent removal for disk space reasons
  -can be installed in /opt as detailed by the FHS,
  -and new releases can be installed over the old,
  +can be installed in /opt as detailed by the FHS
  +(perhaps in /opt/foo-x.x with a link from /opt/foo),
  +and new releases can usually be installed over the old,
   although major upgrades and libraries are generally best upgraded
   by rebuilding the system from the bottom up.
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-book' in the subject header of the message

More information about the lfs-book mailing list