cvs commit: LFS/newxml/chapter07 loadkeys.xml
spambin at apcuk.dyndns.org
Sun Mar 21 15:29:23 PST 2004
On Sun, 21 Mar 2004 23:26:27 +0000, Matthew Burgess thusly spake in
<20040321232627.1eeefda8.matthew at linuxfromscratch.org>:
> On Sun, 21 Mar 2004 19:23:04 -0400
> Anderson Lizardo <lizardo at linuxfromscratch.org> wrote:
>> On Dom, 21 Mar 2004 21:54:24 +0000, Matthew Burgess wrote:
>> > Maybe it would just be better to say something like:
>> > "If you will be compiling the keymap directly in the kernel during
>> > chapter 8 (see kbd for details),..."
>> > Any better/clearer?
>> I'd suggest:
>> "If you plan to compile the keymap directly in the kernel during
>> chapter 8 (see kbd for details)..."
>> Also, I *suspect* you should use "into" instead of "in" in this case:
>> "...compile the keymap directly into the kernel..."
>> Not sure though :)
> Great minds think alike (or we're all fools the same!). Was just about
> to suggest something very similar myself. Cheers.
I like that too :))
The email address above is a spamtrap.
Please reply to alexp -at- apcuk -dot- dyndns -dot- org
More information about the lfs-book