Some small niggles with LFS Book 6.0

Matthew Burgess matthew at
Sat May 14 12:40:16 PDT 2005

Bernard Leak wrote:

> while on the subject of 'mktemp', although patch can be *built*
> without it, it won't *run* without it, which probably ought to be
> mentioned as a dependency.

I've never actually heard of that before.  Up until 5.1, LFS never built 
  `mktemp', and we never had any problems with `patch' reported (at 
least to my knowledge).  It might be worth you posting to lfs-support 
with the error messages you get.

> Chapter 7: "negligable" should be "negligible"
> "distrubtion" should be "distribution" (p. 343, near the end)
> "effected" should be "affected" (p. 264, near the top)

Thanks.  They've all been fixed now.



More information about the lfs-book mailing list