Some small niggles with LFS Book 6.0
matthew at linuxfromscratch.org
Sat May 14 12:40:16 PDT 2005
Bernard Leak wrote:
> while on the subject of 'mktemp', although patch can be *built*
> without it, it won't *run* without it, which probably ought to be
> mentioned as a dependency.
I've never actually heard of that before. Up until 5.1, LFS never built
`mktemp', and we never had any problems with `patch' reported (at
least to my knowledge). It might be worth you posting to lfs-support
with the error messages you get.
> Chapter 7: "negligable" should be "negligible"
> "distrubtion" should be "distribution" (p. 343, near the end)
> "effected" should be "affected" (p. 264, near the top)
Thanks. They've all been fixed now.
More information about the lfs-book