[Bug 1675] Ch. 6 glibc test-installation.pl tests /tools glibc

bugzilla at linuxfromscratch.org bugzilla at linuxfromscratch.org
Thu Jan 5 06:13:15 PST 2006


------- Additional Comments From dbn.lists at gmail.com  2006-01-05 07:13 -------
So, everyone likes 3.  I tested it on an x86 box, and it works.  Now, the one
thing no one has commented on is the use of /lib/ld-linux.so.2.  Maybe I'm being
paranoid, but the dynamic linker doesn't always go by this name.  It even says
in the LFS book.  Should it just be assumed that if you have a different name
(e.g. /lib/ld.so.1) that you can fix the sed for yourself?

I really don't want to scrap the solution for this reason, but just want
everyone to be aware.  If the LFS book is assuming x86 only, then this isn't a
problem.  I don't know what the official stance on that is, though.

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

More information about the lfs-book mailing list