[LFS Trac] #684: Must re-evaluate package order then document the rationale.
jhuntwork at linuxfromscratch.org
Thu Mar 2 15:17:40 PST 2006
LFS Trac wrote:
> Comment (by dbn.lists at gmail.com):
> Also, Gerard asked some time back that Vim be built as early as possible.
> We could probably move it right after Perl with no detrimental effects.
> Is this still the case?
The comments on the ticket are getting long and difficult to read -
that's one of the main reasons Gerard opened up a new thread in lfs-dev,
so let's get discussion going there, if possible, and we can bring
summaries back to the ticket.
Moving vim up in the order is only a personal preference and goes
against the entire purpose of this change, IMHO. We're trying to show by
the order itself, what depends on what. Nothing *depends* on vim, so
leave it at the end.
More information about the lfs-book