r7479 - branches/udev_update/BOOK
ken at linuxfromscratch.org
Thu Mar 30 09:17:15 PST 2006
On Thu, 30 Mar 2006, Matthew Burgess wrote:
> ken at linuxfromscratch.org wrote:
> > Log:
> > New date.
> Hmmm, what's with this apparent convention of changing the date in its own
> revision? I thought it was supposed to get changed along with a Real Change
Atomicity. (i.) if you want to revert a Real Change, it should be
cleaner. (ii.) now that I've got svn merge actually working, no
conflicts (the dates are accompanied by branch titles, so trying to
merge adate change in general.ent produces a lot of mess).
das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce
More information about the lfs-book