no LFS in the Source section of Distrowatch??

Ladislav Bodnar at
Tue Oct 29 07:28:28 PST 2002

On Tuesday 29 October 2002 11:06, Eric Miller wrote:
> Mr. Bodnar-
> Just wanted you to be aware that LFS (newest version at 4.0) is also a
> source-based linux project that should be included on your very highly
> trafficked site:
> While not available in a source/install package like Gentoo and others,
> it's fair to say that it qualifies for inclusion on this list.

Hmm... Technically you are right, it does qualify as a source-based 
distribution. There are a few reasons why I haven't included LFS on that 
particular page:

1. LFS, even the CVS branch does not change on a daily basis like Gentoo and 
others do.

2. LFS is a very basic system so the majority of the fields in the table would 
be empty. This might create a perception that LFS is not rich in features.

3. The idea behind the source distributions page is to monitor what the 
source-based distros are working on. It includes their development branches, 
as opposed to stable releases.

4. Once I include LFS, it will only be fair to include other similar distros 
based on LFS or at least similar in concept. You might be surprised, but 
there are quite a few of them: Arch, BYO, Core, LRs, Murix, Neat, TA, maybe 
some others.

5. My last reason: Gerard hasn't asked me to ;-)

I have considered the idea, but my reasoning has always rejected it. I am open 
to suggestion, so if you give me 6 reasons why it should be included, I might 
just put LFS in. Also, what do others on the list think of this?

LFS does of course have its own page at:

Unsubscribe: send email to listar at
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-chat' in the subject header of the message

More information about the lfs-chat mailing list