A couple of notes about latest LFS
gerard at linuxfromscratch.org
Fri Aug 18 05:13:03 PDT 2000
> I've noticed a couple of things during my latest LFS build. Hopefully I got
> these right. I have to reboot to Red Hat for my email at the moment.
> 1. Need to add --enable-shared to configure line for binutils.
What happens when you don't pass it. My ld, as and such programs are
dynamically linked. Or are certain libraries compiled statically)
> 2. Even then libiberty still get only gets compiled static.
> 3. I believe make -e should still be required for binutils and bzip2 to get
I'd like to use -e as less as possible. It's needed for binutils to get
a static build, but otherwise I'd like to stay away from it. A
non-optimized bzip2 isn't a disaster. Honestly, how often would you run
bzip2 to actually make it count.
> 4. Using the book, you don't get man pages for diff. (I think there are a few
> others but I inadvertently killed my man directory on my LFS system, tar jumps
> to mind also but I'm not sure.)
That's because those packages don't have man-pages. Those packages come
with info pages. The reason that RedHat and other distro's do have man
pages for diff, tar, etc. is because they probably have written those
> 5. I saw someone mention a packaging system, I prefer to use pkgtool from
> Slackware. Very simple, just a couple of shell scripts. Seems to fit nicely
> with the LFS philosophy. It's a little work but very flexible.
Or use rpm. Or deb. I'm leaving that open to the user so he can
implement whatever he or she is comfortable with.
-*- If Linux doesn't have the solution, you have the wrong problem -*-
Mail archive: http://www.pcrdallas.com/mail-archives/lfs-discuss
IRC access: server: irc.linuxfromscratch.org port: 6667 channel: #LFS
Unsubscribe: email lfs-discuss-request at linuxfromscratch.org and put
"unsubscribe" (without the quotation marks) in the body of the message
(no subject is required)
More information about the lfs-dev