LFS editor of choice - cautionary tale!
jim at vardus.net
Fri Dec 1 03:14:51 PST 2000
Something that I am suprised has not been mentioned in this whole debate
over editors is *where* the editor is installed. Perhaps this only really
applies if you install in different partitions, e.g. / hda2, /usr hda3,
etc. However, the first time I installed LFS across partitions was back in
the day when I though emacs was worth the rescources it uses. I had
installed it in the place of vim in the book and everything was fine...
until I needed to drop down to run level 1... Of course emacs was installed
in /usr and I had not bothered installing vi so I was in runlevel 1 without
an editor. Did I feel silly? I think so!
I guess the moral of the story is to have some sort of editor in /bin for
such occasions - clearly full blown emacs and the like is not sutable for
this, although ce (Chet's emacs) does the job nicely, so from personal
expernce I do recommned you have vi (or something) installed in /bin -
because some day, when your boss is screaming at you to get that server up
again, you just might wish you had!
just my 2pence,
P.S. To those no vi-ers, It really aint that bad to learn or use - and who
knows when you might have to get someones shonkOS^H^H^H^H^HSunOS box back up
again! (or your own for that matter!)
Unsubscribe: send email to lfs-discuss-request at linuxfromscratch.org
and put unsubscribe in the subject header of the message
More information about the lfs-dev