LFS editor of choice should be vi
jdinardo at ix.netcom.com
Fri Dec 1 06:05:15 PST 2000
I first learned vi in 1985 and I hated it. In the intervening 15 years I have
never learned to like it. I did not like emacs either so I wrote my own editor
which I have ported linux and use almost exclusively.
HOWEVER , vi is part of what makes unix unix. (I consider linux to be unix).
It is part of the least common denominator of all linux/unix systems. I think
it would be a terrible thing for it not to be part of LFS.
LFS is about choice but more importantly it is about learning. I have worked
on many systems where vi and ed were the only editors on the system and I
would have been lost if not for my limited knowledge of vi.
I am writing this from mutt where I have left vi the default editor just
to keep myself familiar with vi.
On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 12:49:50PM -0500, Jesse Tie Ten Quee wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 10:45:20AM -0700, Seth Payne wrote:
> > Certainly vi is the most widely used text editor but I don't imagine
> > compiling pico, jed, joe, etc... is terribly complex. It wouldnt hurt to
> > include these editors in the hints section. I wonder if its really
> > necessary. Perhaps it is my own ignorance but once a person has completed
> > bulding an LFS system they should be pretty familiar with ./configure make
> > make install. I suppose redundancy never hurt.
> That's what i'd like to see, would give alot more flexibility also then
> including them in the book.
> Anyone else want to speak up on this? Gerard does have the final say
> anyways, so it's really up to him (for better or worse) but he always
> listens to the LFS Community, speak up if i were you... ;)
> Jesse Tie Ten Quee - highos at highos dot com
> Unsubscribe: send email to lfs-discuss-request at linuxfromscratch.org
> and put unsubscribe in the subject header of the message
Unsubscribe: send email to lfs-discuss-request at linuxfromscratch.org
and put unsubscribe in the subject header of the message
More information about the lfs-dev