PAM libs and patches - APPENDED - needed "words"

Thomas T. Veldhouse veldy at veldy.net
Tue Dec 5 10:17:52 PST 2000


This is OK - except perhaps one would want to compile their own cracklib
instead of rely upon a prebuilt version :)

Also, I did get pwdb to compile nicely and it wasn't hard to find - debian
sources.

Tom Veldhouse
veldy at veldy.net

----- Original Message -----
From: "Gerard Beekmans" <gerard at linuxfromscratch.org>
To: <lfs-discuss at linuxfromscratch.org>
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 12:16 PM
Subject: Re: PAM libs and patches - APPENDED - needed "words"


> On December  5, 2000 12:24 pm, you wrote:
> > The PAM discussion just came up this morning.  I decided to make an
attempt
> > at getting PAM to work.  I have built some patches that will
successfully
> > compile on a base LFS system.  Somebody please give them a try and let
me
> > know if they have any luck with them.  Please send me any successful
> > configuration tips :)
>
> there's an lfs hint on pam (a more extensive one is being written last I
> heard) already available at
> http://archive.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs-hints/pam.txt
>
> --
> Gerard Beekmans
> www.linuxfromscratch.org
>
> -*- If Linux doesn't have the solution, you have the wrong problem -*-
>
> --
> Unsubscribe: send email to lfs-discuss-request at linuxfromscratch.org
> and put unsubscribe in the subject header of the message
>
>


-- 
Unsubscribe: send email to lfs-discuss-request at linuxfromscratch.org
and put unsubscribe in the subject header of the message




More information about the lfs-dev mailing list