sysklogd (2.4.0-test11 glibc-2.2)

Sergey Ostrovsky sostrovsky at snip.net
Thu Dec 7 04:41:21 PST 2000


"Thomas T. Veldhouse" wrote:

> Yes!
>
> Tom Veldhouse
> veldy at veldy.net
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Hendrik Volker Brunn" <hvb at gmx.net>
> To: <lfs-discuss at linuxfromscratch.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2000 10:25 AM
> Subject: Re: sysklogd (2.4.0-test11 glibc-2.2)
>
> > On Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 10:24:27PM -0500, Sergey Ostrovsky wrote:
> > > I built sysklogd-1.4 with 2.4.0-test10 headers w/o problem.
> > > I know, it doesn't help thought.
> >
> > But you didn't use glibc-2.2, did you?
> >
> > So anybody having compiled sysklogd with glibc-2.2?
> >
> > Hendrik
> >
> > --
> > Every journalist has a novel in him, which is an excellent place for it.
> >
> > ## Linux 2.4.0-test11 running on an i586 ##
> >
> > --
> > Unsubscribe: send email to lfs-discuss-request at linuxfromscratch.org
> > and put unsubscribe in the subject header of the message
> >
> >
>
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                              Name: sysklogd-1.4.patch.bz2
>    sysklogd-1.4.patch.bz2    Type: unspecified type (application/octet-stream)
>                          Encoding: base64

Well, kind of strange thing - I did not receive this responce from H.V. Brunn.
Anyway, yes - I use glibc-2.2. But I do not use 2.4.0test11 - there isn't an
official reiserfs patch for it yet.
2.4.0test11 is fine. I suspect the kernel headers layout slightly changed again.

Sergey Ostrovsky.



-- 
Unsubscribe: send email to lfs-discuss-request at linuxfromscratch.org
and put unsubscribe in the subject header of the message




More information about the lfs-dev mailing list