rc?

Brett generica at email.com
Mon Dec 11 12:45:23 PST 2000



Hey

Makes perfect sense to me.
And sounds a lot more plausible than "runlevel control",
or whatever the other theory was, that completely disregarded .*rc files
do we have consensus ?

	/ Brett

On Mon, 11 Dec 2000, Hendrik Volker Brunn wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 08:28:13PM +0100, Thomas 'Balu' Walter wrote:
> > 
> > And what about vimrc, muttrc, ...? 
> > 
> > Those are just config-files
> 
> Ususally you could pass the configuration by command line switches. *rc
> -files save you from passing the switches every time.
> 
> So instead of (r)unning your (c)ommand with a command line you have
> parameters in your rc-file. It's no contradiction, isn't it?
> 



-- 
Unsubscribe: send email to lfs-discuss-request at linuxfromscratch.org
and put unsubscribe in the subject header of the message




More information about the lfs-dev mailing list