durandal at nfinity.de
Sun Jun 11 18:15:48 PDT 2000
On Sun, Jun 11, 2000 at 06:48:51PM -0500, Kurt V. Hindenburg wrote:
> start-stop-daemon.c has a comment in the beginning :
> * A rewrite of the original Debian's start-stop-daemon Perl script
> * in C (faster - it is executed many times during system startup).
> Would bash script be faster than C? or perl?
No, but which of the following do you think would be faster:
1) bash -> start-stop-daemon -> program_to_start
2) bash -> program_to_start
The way it's being done is obviously 1, so there must be a reason why
we can't do 2. Any comments are very much welcome.
Georg Wilckens <durandal at nfinity.de>
Experience is the worst teacher. It always gives the test first and
the instruction afterward.
Mail archive: http://www.pcrdallas.com/mail-archives/lfs-discuss
IRC access: server: irc.linuxfromscratch.org port: 6667 channel: #LFS
News Reader access: news.pcrdallas.com
Unsubscribe: email lfs-discuss-request at linuxfromscratch.org and put
"unsubscribe" (without the quotation marks) in the body of the message
(no subject is required)
More information about the lfs-dev