Greg T Hill
greghill at terranova.net
Mon Jun 12 20:22:58 PDT 2000
Georg Wilckens wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 11, 2000 at 06:48:51PM -0500, Kurt V. Hindenburg wrote:
> > start-stop-daemon.c has a comment in the beginning :
> > /*
> > * A rewrite of the original Debian's start-stop-daemon Perl script
> > * in C (faster - it is executed many times during system startup).
> > Would bash script be faster than C? or perl?
> No, but which of the following do you think would be faster:
> 1) bash -> start-stop-daemon -> program_to_start
> 2) bash -> program_to_start
> The way it's being done is obviously 1, so there must be a reason why
> we can't do 2. Any comments are very much welcome.
I don't know, but it seems that directly calling the program to start it
from the script would make no difference, probably be faster. ps h -C
<daemon> gives the process information in one line, if someone knows how
to use cut to put the pid into a variable, then that could be used for
the stop, restart, reload cases. Better or faster? Does reqiure
textutils if you use cut, or maybe sed would work. A challenge for some
shell scripter out there?
Mail archive: http://www.pcrdallas.com/mail-archives/lfs-discuss
IRC access: server: irc.linuxfromscratch.org port: 6667 channel: #LFS
News Reader access: news.pcrdallas.com
Unsubscribe: email lfs-discuss-request at linuxfromscratch.org and put
"unsubscribe" (without the quotation marks) in the body of the message
(no subject is required)
More information about the lfs-dev