durandal at nfinity.de
Fri Jun 23 02:38:36 PDT 2000
On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 03:49:29PM -0400, Gerard Beekmans wrote:
> I don't know who mentioned that site but I've read it. Though I do agree
I'm guilty of it.
> why things like Reply-to shouldn't be munged they do leave out one good
> reason: how do you reply *only* to the list?
They left that reason out because it's a MUA issue.
Fortunately good MUAs have resolved it. :)
Snipplet from mutt-Docu:
list-reply (default: L)
Reply to the current or tagged message(s) by extracting any addresses
which match the addresses given by the ``lists'' command. Using this
when replying to messages posted to mailing lists help avoid duplicate
copies being sent to the author of the message you are replying to.
> I can do a group reply and it will send a message to the author *and*
> the mailinglist. I consider that a waste. The author is in 99% of the
Yup, I agree. Sooo... could I convince you? It is going to be a change
for the list users but it's the Way To Go [tm].
Georg Wilckens <durandal at nfinity.de>
24 hours in a day...24 beers in a case...coincidence?
Mail archive: http://www.pcrdallas.com/mail-archives/lfs-discuss
IRC access: server: irc.linuxfromscratch.org port: 6667 channel: #LFS
Unsubscribe: email lfs-discuss-request at linuxfromscratch.org and put
"unsubscribe" (without the quotation marks) in the body of the message
(no subject is required)
More information about the lfs-dev