Static vs Shared

Sam BC sambc at nights.force9.co.uk
Mon Jun 26 11:24:19 PDT 2000


When compiling the initial bits of the system, compiling a prog to use
shared libraries won't be much good, if I understand correctly, as it will
not link at run-time.


SamBC

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-lfs-discuss at pcrdallas.com
> [mailto:owner-lfs-discuss at pcrdallas.com]On Behalf Of Dean Feldpausch
> Sent: 26 June 2000 14:21
> To: lfs-discuss at linuxfromscratch.org
> Subject: Static vs Shared
>
>
> Question,
>
> Is there any reason to compile static support if your using
> shared libraries.  Is I am ./configuring, I often see support
> for both configured, but am wondering if static is needed.
>
> Thank you
>

--
Mail archive: http://www.pcrdallas.com/mail-archives/lfs-discuss
IRC access: server: irc.linuxfromscratch.org port: 6667 channel: #LFS
Unsubscribe: email lfs-discuss-request at linuxfromscratch.org and put
"unsubscribe" (without the quotation marks) in the body of the message
(no subject is required)



More information about the lfs-dev mailing list