init and killscripts runlevel 0 & 6

Donnie Roos dr at kaneda.demon.nl
Thu Nov 16 21:43:31 PST 2000


At 06:18 PM 11/16/00 -0500, Gerard Beekmans wrote:

>> I think it would be better to first run the scripts for runlevel
>> and than send the TERM & KILL signals. I makes more sense to me
>> fisrt running the 'cleanup' scripts for a runlevel and than terminate
>> any remaining processes by sending TERM & KILL

>That's how it works right now. The first term&kill come from sysvinit
>which I can't seem to stop. the second term&kill comes from the
>S80sendsignals symlinks that's run after the K scripts brought down
>services in a 'civilized' manner

I don't think I made myself clear. The current situation is as you
describe. sysvinit sends the signals and then runs the scripts
I am talking about sysvinit first running the scripts before sending
the TERM & KILL signals. So first T&K from S80sendsignals and second
T&K from sysvinit.

Donnie


-- 
Unsubscribe: send email to lfs-discuss-request at linuxfromscratch.org
and put unsubscribe in the subject header of the message




More information about the lfs-dev mailing list