Implied int types

Sergey Ostrovsky sostrovsky at snip.net
Sat Oct 7 14:54:17 PDT 2000


Rod Roark wrote:

> Yeah, it didn't work.   -- Rod
>
> On Sat, 07 Oct 2000, Sergey Ostrovsky wrote:
> > Rod Roark wrote:
> >
> > > In compiling various add-on packages for my LFS system, I have run
> > > across several source files where gcc errors out on this type of
> > > statement:
> > >
> > >   static <variable-name> = <integer-literal>;
> > >
> > > where the proper form is:
> > >
> > >   static int <variable-name> = <integer-literal>;
> > >
> > > Evidently the first form is accepted by some compilers.  Does anyone
> > > know of a compiler option that will get gcc-2.95.2 to accept it also?
> > > I'm getting tired of patching all this source code.
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > -- Rod
> > >    http://www.sunsetsystems.com/
> >
> > Hi Rod,
> > the only gcc option to process pre-ANSI crap is -traditional ...
> > Have you tried ?
> >
> > Sergey Ostrovsky
>
> --
> Unsubscribe: send email to lfs-discuss-request at linuxfromscratch.org
> and put unsubscribe in the subject header of the message

And without -ansi ?

Sergey Ostrovsky.



-- 
Unsubscribe: send email to lfs-discuss-request at linuxfromscratch.org
and put unsubscribe in the subject header of the message




More information about the lfs-dev mailing list