more on required packages

Jesse Tie Ten Quee highos at highos.com
Fri Sep 1 03:45:14 PDT 2000


Yo

On Thu, Aug 31, 2000 at 10:09:19AM +0200, Thomas 'Balu' Walter wrote:
> talking about autoconf - autoconf and automake are not needed until you
> want to do your own new config.in or makefile.in (while patching a
> packet or similar), correct?

Are you sure about that? The minute you patch...

> Most other things are essential for a running system (many programs need
> perl to do this or that)

I consider LFS to be a full development system...one needs automake/autoconf for that

Just my 0.02 cents...

-
Jesse Tie Ten Quee - highos at highos dot com





More information about the lfs-dev mailing list