more on required packages

Jesse Tie Ten Quee highos at
Fri Sep 1 13:34:57 PDT 2000


On Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 01:23:04PM -0700, John Arrowwood wrote:
> To YOU it is a development platform.  To me, it is a slim, sleek workhorse.
> Different people are drawn to LFS for different reasons.  That's the reason
> for "required" vs. "optional" in the first place...  :)

Right, so offer time todo it with Gerard (or whomever) and get it done *G*

Trust me, a slim and sleek workhorse is what i think of LFS too... and like i've mentioned before, just remove all devel packages, that strips out alot from LFS =)

Jesse Tie Ten Quee - highos at highos dot com

More information about the lfs-dev mailing list