gcc doesn't compile using RH7 as base?

Gian Piero Sala gpierosala at galactica.it
Mon Jan 29 14:56:48 PST 2001


----- Original Message -----
From: "Christian Gardner" <cg237 at hermes.cam.ac.uk>
To: <lfs-discuss at linuxfromscratch.org>
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2001 4:28 AM
Subject: Re: gcc doesn't compile using RH7 as base?


>
> > To compile gcc-2.95.2 on a glibc-2.2 based machine you need to apply a
> patch to
> > GCC (Redhat7 and the upcoming LFS-3.0 are glibc-2.2 based). A better
> > thing is using gcc-2.95.2.1 instead of gcc-2.95.2. The 2.95.2.1 version
> > of gcc has that patch already applied and solves a few other minor
> > problems.
>
> I see what you're saying, but when I use rpm -q to see what versions I've
> got, it's glibc-2.1.92-14 and gcc-2.96-54. Should I still try using
> gcc-2.95.2.1 ? Do you mean, as the compiler, or as the thing to be
> compiled? Clear as mud, I'm sure.
>

I had an identical RH7 *full* installed distro (glibc 2.1.92 & gcc 2.96.54),
and I was able to compile gcc 2.95.2.1 (patched with pgcc) with that kind of
stuff.
Go for gcc 2.95.2.1.

--
       ,,,,
      /'^'\
     ( o o )
-oOOO--(_)--OOOo----------------------------------------------------
                             Time flows only once.
            Life is a suicide mission: you gotta do what you should.
 .oooO                    zeox <- at -> gpsala at tin.it
 (   ) Oooo.      penguin inside (linux 2.4.0) - pNETsnd #:))
--\ (--(   )--------------------------------------------------------
   \_)  ) /
       (_/



-- 
Unsubscribe: send email to lfs-discuss-request at linuxfromscratch.org
and put unsubscribe in the subject header of the message




More information about the lfs-dev mailing list