nslookup

Scot Mc Pherson behomet at home.com
Sat Jul 14 12:30:12 PDT 2001


Oh yeah, and I thought you said BIND was complaining, not nslookup.


Scot Mc Pherson
~Linux is a journey, not a guided tour~



----- Original Message -----
From: Scot Mc Pherson <behomet at home.com>
To: <lfs-discuss at linuxfromscratch.org>
Sent: Saturday, July 14, 2001 3:26 PM
Subject: Re: nslookup


> Sure...Have you looked in your daemon.log ?? You might find that a lot of
> your db statements aren't working. The structure of the files in the
> strictest sense of the word, didn't change, but BIND 8 was more forgiving
> and certain mistakes and oversights didn't effect named, but in 9 they
must
> be correct. for example TLLs
>
>
>
> Scot Mc Pherson
> ~Linux is a journey, not a guided tour~
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David A. Bandel <david at pananix.com>
> To: <lfs-discuss at linuxfromscratch.org>
> Sent: Saturday, July 14, 2001 10:17 AM
> Subject: Re: nslookup
>
>
> > Scot Mc Pherson wrote:
> > >
> > > Actually BIND9 works very well. It is likely that you aren't compiling
> it or
> > > setting it up properly if its complaining about anything. The conf and
> db
> > > files are set up quite a bit differently, infact as different as BIND4
> and
> > > BIND8 were.
> >
> > My experience was a little different.  nslookup will complain because
> > it's supposedly deprecated and slated for removal (OK with me, I always
> > liked dig better anyway -- dig's output can be used directly as a db
> > file).
> >
> > The /etc/named.conf file syntax is the same, just some different
> > statements inside, but nothing like the difference between 4 and 8.  My
> > /etc/named.conf worked from 8 to 9, no conversion needed.  As for the db
> > files, mine worked just fine as well.  What's different here?  That I
> > can see, nothing apart from the ability to include the ipv6 AAAA RRs.
> >
> > Can you elaborate please?
> >
> > Ciao,
> >
> > David A. Bandel
> > --
> > Focus on the dream, not the competition.
> > -- Nemesis Racing Team motto
> > --
> > Unsubscribe: send email to lfs-discuss-request at linuxfromscratch.org
> > and put unsubscribe in the subject header of the message
> >
>
> --
> Unsubscribe: send email to lfs-discuss-request at linuxfromscratch.org
> and put unsubscribe in the subject header of the message
>

-- 
Unsubscribe: send email to lfs-discuss-request at linuxfromscratch.org
and put unsubscribe in the subject header of the message



More information about the lfs-dev mailing list