The uname hack revisited
tommyw at ntlworld.com
Fri Jul 20 02:23:28 PDT 2001
On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 07:41:48PM -0400, Kevin Krumwiede wrote:
> I always wondered why, instead of hacking uname itself, it can't be
> temporarily renamed or moved and replaced with a script that fakes the -m
> option and calls the original for everything else?
> raw (hmm, where's my bash book?):
> if [ "$1" = '-m' ]; then
> echo 'i386'
> /usr/bin/uname-orig $@
Two reasons: why is this simpler than running the output of the
original uname through sed?
And what happens to other options which happen to produce the machine
type? Specifically uname -a? The sed mangling is reasonably future
Unsubscribe: send email to lfs-discuss-request at linuxfromscratch.org
and put unsubscribe in the subject header of the message
More information about the lfs-dev