Distro's friendly to LFS's (was Re: sh-utils)

arthur at linuxbox.nu arthur at linuxbox.nu
Wed Mar 7 09:05:18 PST 2001


I have only done Debian potato so far, but what distro's are "LFS"
friendly?  What are "LFS" hostile?

Arthur H. Johnson II
Systems Engineer
The Linux Box
arthur at linuxbox.nu
http://www.linuxbox.nu

On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Martin Imobersteg wrote:

> > I'm testing LFS-3.0 on various systems. I've finished testing on RedHat
> 6.2
> > yesterday and it went without a hitch. I'm going to try out Debian 2.1
> today
> > and over the next few days I'll be hopping to linuxiso.org and download
> some
> > of the often used distributions (latest redhat, suse, slackware and so
> forth).
>
> A ALFS testkit would be nice for such jobs. For example, you can't download
> the latest suse distribution yet. (glibc 2.2 / kernel 2.4 )
> But someone who got it allredy can do the test for you with this testkit.
>
> PS: Suse 7.1 will work with LFS-3.0
>
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribe: send email to lfs-discuss-request at linuxfromscratch.org
> and put unsubscribe in the subject header of the message
>


-- 
Unsubscribe: send email to lfs-discuss-request at linuxfromscratch.org
and put unsubscribe in the subject header of the message




More information about the lfs-dev mailing list