Distro's friendly to LFS's (was Re: sh-utils)

arthur at linuxbox.nu arthur at linuxbox.nu
Thu Mar 8 07:39:04 PST 2001


Has anybody had any luck compiling a new LFS from an older LFS?

Arthur H. Johnson II
Systems Engineer
The Linux Box
arthur at linuxbox.nu
http://www.linuxbox.nu

On Thu, 8 Mar 2001 peram at mnemonic.no wrote:

>
> On 07-Mar-2001 Sanjuro Europa wrote:
> > At 12:05 07-03-2001 -0500, you wrote:
> >>I have only done Debian potato so far, but what distro's are "LFS"
> >>friendly?  What are "LFS" hostile?
> >
> > Redhat 7.0 is certainly hostile.
> >
> > Redhat 6.2 works fine.
> >
> > Sanjuro
> >
>
> In fact RedHat 7.0 is OK if you update to the latest RPM's of :
>
>    gcc
>    gcc-c++
>    glibc*
>    libstdc++-*
>
> At least it worked for me.
>
> Peram
>
> **--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--
> Per Arne Munthe,Senior Consultant          Email : peram at mnemonic.no
> Mnemonic AS, Waldemar Thranesgt. 77        Phone : +47 2299 9704 (Direct)
> N-0175 Oslo, NORWAY                        Fax   : +47 2299 9701
>
> --
> Unsubscribe: send email to lfs-discuss-request at linuxfromscratch.org
> and put unsubscribe in the subject header of the message
>


-- 
Unsubscribe: send email to lfs-discuss-request at linuxfromscratch.org
and put unsubscribe in the subject header of the message




More information about the lfs-dev mailing list