Fwd: Re: make error with glibc-2.2.2
gerard at linuxfromscratch.org
Wed Mar 14 06:10:30 PST 2001
> Thanks. Creating a static linked bison got glibc-2.2.2 to install.
> I'm new to the lists, sorry I missed your earlier posting.
> Should static link bison become part of chapter 5 in LFS 3.0?
It will, when LFS is going to use glibc-2.2.2. Right now I'm a bit wary of it
seeing the many problems it brings like a lot of packages that don't compile
properly due to changes that glibc-2.2.2 made. I rather wait a little while
and give other packages the chance to update themselves to they compile with
Glibc-2.2.2. Sure we can get all the LFS based packages to compile with
glibc-2.2.2 without much problems but then let's look at what the user wants
to add. You won't be able, reportedly, to compile XFree86 4.0.2 without doing
a lot of hacking on it. Is it worth it, I don't think so. Not yet anyway
-*- If Linux doesn't have the solution, you have the wrong problem -*-
Unsubscribe: send email to lfs-discuss-request at linuxfromscratch.org
and put unsubscribe in the subject header of the message
More information about the lfs-dev