Typo in 2.4.4 LFS?

StyX styx at mailbox.as
Wed Mar 14 09:11:01 PST 2001


If he compiled glibc outside the chroot'ed environment, I wouldn't worry
about that. Even if that is an issue, the path that would be hardcoded
in the binary would be /mnt/lfs/usr/bin, and that wouldn't exist either,
right? Am I missing something here?

Björn Lindberg wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 12 Mar 2001, Gerard Beekmans wrote:
> 
> > On March 12, 2001 01:14 pm, Jason L. Smith wrote:
> > > Thanks for the explanation -- I didn't make the
> > > across-page connection there.  Of course, I went ahead
> > > with my incorrection (it ought to be a word) and sure
> > > enough, I have the pt_chown binary in
> > > /mnt/lfs/mnt/lfs/usr/bin !  Can I just move this to
> > > where it belongs (/mnt/lfs/usr/bin) ?
> >
> > yes just move it, it will be allright.
> 
> Are you sure about this? since pt_chown gets called by other
> programs, I suspect that the path might get hard coded into other
> binaries during compilation.
> 
> Björn
> 
> --
> Unsubscribe: send email to lfs-discuss-request at linuxfromscratch.org
> and put unsubscribe in the subject header of the message

Regards

-- 

StyX
styx at mailbox.as

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GCM/CS/CC/IT d?>d s:>s++:++ a? C++>C++++$ UL++++ 
P+>P+++++ L++>L+++++$ E--- W++>$ N++ w--- PS PE Y+ 
PGP>PGP+++ t+ 5 X+ R+ tv+ b+ D-- G++ e->e+++++ h-->h++ y?
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------


-- 
Unsubscribe: send email to lfs-discuss-request at linuxfromscratch.org
and put unsubscribe in the subject header of the message




More information about the lfs-dev mailing list