Sander Striker s.striker at striker.nl
Sat Mar 17 10:11:13 PST 2001

> On Saturday 17 March 2001 12:25, Jack Detrick wrote:
> > I wouldn't play with 2.95.3 just yet. The changelog states that GCC has
> > been brought more up to ANSI standards, meaning a lot of the sloppy
> > code that may have "slipped by" with previous versions won't compile
> > with this version.  I think it's better to wait a while for patches/new
> > releases/whatever of whatever software you're going to expect to build
> > smoothly under this new version.
> This must mean you were able to find and download it from somewhere. May
> I ask where in the ?!$**grumble$!? you downloaded it from? Please? ;)
> I read about the _apparent_ release at ...
> http://gcc.gnu.org/
> http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-2.95/gcc-2.95.3.html
> ....
> However, I go to all the places you would think to download it, and quite
> simply a 2.95.3 release does *not* exist (as of this message). There was
> only a /pub/sourceware/gcc/releases/gcc-2.95.3-prerelease/ directory and
> nothing else.
> Unless... I am _completely_blind_ ??? And stupid??? (could be ;))
> Perhaps they have somehow unreleased it??? Suggestions where to get it?
> Or should I just stick with gcc- ?

I downloaded it from:
A local mirror.


Unsubscribe: send email to lfs-discuss-request at linuxfromscratch.org
and put unsubscribe in the subject header of the message

More information about the lfs-dev mailing list