f.fracassi at gmx.net
Tue Mar 20 14:19:26 PST 2001
On Tuesday 20 March 2001 20:39, Marc Heerdink wrote:
> arthur at linuxbox.nu wrote on Tue, 20 Mar 2001 13:49:55 -0500 (EST):
> > I would have to agree. Lilo is getting more and more improved. I don't
> > see any reason to switch to a different boot loader. More people use
> > Lilo than Grub, at least that seems to be the perception. We should
> > probably stick to whats most popular.
> Then we would stick to windows :) No seriously, we should use the best of
> the two. Sounds quite simple, but it's hard to decide which one is better.
> Both of them boot Linux, both of them boot other OS-es.
>LILO has a menu, grub doesn't (?).
It does, and a real good looking one. :)
>Grub has a good command line, LILO hasn't. Grub can boot
> your system when the config has changed, LILO can't. Let's use grub once
> it's declared stable.
Unsubscribe: send email to lfs-discuss-request at linuxfromscratch.org
and put unsubscribe in the subject header of the message
More information about the lfs-dev