gcc-2.95.3

Thomas 'Balu' Walter tw at itreff.de
Thu Mar 29 11:10:35 PST 2001


+-J. Jones-(jdj at darkside.dynup.net)-[29.03.01 21:06]:
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 06:50:06PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > But then in the book is written to create a link from
> > $LFS/usr/lib/gcc-lib/*/2.95.3/cpp to $LFS/lib/cpp and $LFS/usr/lib. But
> > in $LFS/usr/lib/gcc-lib/*/2.95.3/ I don't have the file cpp. I only have
> > cpp0. Should I link to that file or what went wrong there?
> > Another question:
> 
> Yes, link to the /usr/lib/gcc-lib/*/2.95.3/cpp0.  I haven't really noticed any
> build differences between the glibc 2.2's.

NO, don't link to cpp0! The name-change was done to avoid the confusion
with all those cpp's - /usr/bin/cpp should be the target of your link.

If you want to install such a bleeding-edge-system you might check out
the mailinglist-archive. Most questions were answered there already (and
we are working hard to get LFS-3.0pre2 out soon :)

     Ba-void.main(void){}-lu

-- 
Unsubscribe: send email to lfs-discuss-request at linuxfromscratch.org
and put unsubscribe in the subject header of the message




More information about the lfs-dev mailing list