gcc-2.95.3

Marc Heerdink marc_heerdink at softhome.net
Thu Mar 29 11:44:57 PST 2001


Thomas Schwinge wrote on Thu, 29 Mar 2001 18:50:06 +0200:
> But then in the book is written to create a link from
> $LFS/usr/lib/gcc-lib/*/2.95.3/cpp to $LFS/lib/cpp and $LFS/usr/lib. But
> in $LFS/usr/lib/gcc-lib/*/2.95.3/ I don't have the file cpp. I only have
> cpp0. Should I link to that file or what went wrong there?

Link to /usr/bin/cpp.

> Another question:
> I've planned to install glibc-2.2.2 istead of 2.2.1.
> Are there any problems?

Use 2.2.1 for now... we'll wait until all common programs compile flawlessly on
glibc 2.2.2 before it's used in the book.

-- 
There is no programming language, no matter how structured,
that will prevent programmers from writing bad programs.
- L. Flon

Marc Heerdink
marc_heerdink at softhome.net
http://www.koelkast.net/

-- 
Unsubscribe: send email to lfs-discuss-request at linuxfromscratch.org
and put unsubscribe in the subject header of the message




More information about the lfs-dev mailing list