lists at schwicky.net
Sat Mar 31 16:05:37 PST 2001
On Sat, 31 Mar 2001 14:25:57 +0200, Rudolf Floers said:
> > This is one thing I hate about Linux (the kernel). It used to be a very
> > powerful and efficient thing. But as the newer version came it got less and
> > less true IMHO. Things are getting implemented that you can really wonder
> > about. I mean why do we need a database to access the SCSI controller? Why
> > don't implement the priority queue for TCQ commands in a SQL-database? I don't
> > understand this and as I don't want to install he old db1 I will continue using
> i understand that you don't like the idea of the kernel needing a database
> at all. i don't understand, though, why using SQL should be any better
> than db1.
> please, tell.. ;)
Hell no!!! Using an SQL-databse is my nightmare... If the developper does that
I'll make an ddos on the servers where the kernels are distributed.... ;-) or
some other kind of attentat.
I' just horrified by the fact it needs a database to access an scsi controller.
It worked years without it... And to be honnest I never had troubles with my
Jean-Pierre Schwickerath - Powered by GNU/LinuX! <==-
E-Mail: lists at schwicky.net - http://schwicky.net
PGP Key ID: 0x48C39212 - AIM: Schwicky - ICQ's UIN: 4690141
Nothing's impossible... Everything is relative!
Unsubscribe: send email to lfs-discuss-request at linuxfromscratch.org
and put unsubscribe in the subject header of the message
More information about the lfs-dev