Just a thought that popped into my head

Jeff linuxmail at comcast.net
Sun May 5 21:11:45 PDT 2002


When we go to LFS4.x would/should/could there be a hint/suggestion/blfs item
to deal with putting gcc2.95.3 on the system beside gcc3 to cut down on a
possible influx of support questions dealing with packages (non-LFS) that
don't yet comply with gcc3? Again, this just popped into my head and I thought
it might bear some pondering by others.

-- 
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message



More information about the lfs-dev mailing list