Pending GCC-3.1 upgrade - do or don't

Ian Molton spyro at
Wed May 8 02:19:08 PDT 2002

On Tue, 7 May 2002 22:02:19 -0400
timothy bauscher <timothy at> wrote:

> > 'If it aint broke, dont fix it' ?
> Ian, i think you are just afraid of change.

Im autistic, duh :-)

Seriously, though whilst I am autistic and cautious of change, I dont
stick with old code, WHEN the NEW code is BETTER.

> the 2.2* kernel isn't broke, but we use
> the 2.4* kernel ... why not upgrade to the
> latest stable release?

2.4 is faster, has better hardware support, is more actively maintained.

Makes sense to use it.

GCC3 may be more actively developed, but it isnt faster, doesnt produce
better code (often worse), and isnt stable yet.

Oh, by the way, your analogy below is flawed. its NOT the method of
reproduction that causes evolution. evolution occurs when a random
change in the snails DNA gives it an advantage, and that can happen in
the asexual snails just as easily.

> <weird analogy, very OT>
> some snails produce asexually. this way, they
> keep the genes they have, the ones they already
> know 'work'. this is the safe route.
> some other snails produce sexually. this way,
> they evolve, giving them more 'features' (*grin*)
> and {snail,bug} fixes. while this isn't a safe
> approach, and is really quite nasty honestly, it
> gives their species a better chance at survival.
> i forgot what this had to with anything ...
> </weird analogy, very OT>
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message

More information about the lfs-dev mailing list