Pending GCC-3.1 upgrade - do or don't

Michael W Daniels daniels at
Wed May 8 07:35:26 PDT 2002

At 10:05 AM 5/8/2002 +0100, you wrote:
>If not faster, why upgrade? (noone has answered this yet, with the
>(questionable) excpetion of C++ support which unless you use KDE is only
>a VERY small fraction of packages. besides KDE compiles fine on 2.95.3.)

Michael W. Daniels          | "The thunder was ominous-sounding, much
daniels at |  like the sound of a thin sheet of metal
Department of Linguistics   |  being shaken backstage during the storm
218 Oxley Hall              |  scene in a play."

Unsubscribe: send email to listar at
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message

More information about the lfs-dev mailing list