Pending GCC-3.1 upgrade - do or don't

Ian Molton spyro at
Wed May 8 08:02:18 PDT 2002

On Wed, 8 May 2002 09:52:37 -0400
Kevan Shea <biffcool at> wrote:

> > If not faster, why upgrade? (noone has answered this yet, with the
> > (questionable) excpetion of C++ support which unless you use KDE is
> > only a VERY small fraction of packages. besides KDE compiles fine on
> > 2.95.3.)
> If 3.x is "the same" as 2.95.x under almost all circumstances, and
> does C++ BETTER, and is more up to date, then we'd upgrade for those
> exact reasons

yes, of course. However gcc 3.x hasnt proved itself to be 'the same' or
better yet. At least, not according to its writers, whose opinions
apparently dont matter...
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message

More information about the lfs-dev mailing list