Pending GCC-3.1 upgrade - do or don't

Gerard Beekmans gerard at
Wed May 8 08:15:52 PDT 2002

On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 04:03:59PM +0100, Ian Molton wrote:
> but slightly better C++ isnt a reason to move the entire base distro
> over to an experimental C compiler.

Can you point me to an URL on or their mailinglist archives
that tell me that gcc-3 is experimental and shouldn't be used? I honestly
did try to find such emails to back it up (if it's indeed labelled
experimantal I will be more hesitant to add it to the book. A long standing
policy is not to include beta/experimantal software).

Gerard Beekmans

-*- If Linux doesn't have the solution, you have the wrong problem -*-
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message

More information about the lfs-dev mailing list