Pending GCC-3.1 upgrade - do or don't

Ian Molton spyro at
Wed May 8 09:17:11 PDT 2002

On Wed, 8 May 2002 10:00:56 -0400
Kevan Shea <biffcool at> wrote:

> And in respect to your previous question about if it ain't broke don't
> fix it.  No very few people around here go by that, like Gerard said
> at the start of this thread, if we went by that we would have stopped
> with the LFS-HOWTO 1.0.

Oh? Are you seriously trying to say the quality of system LFS 1.0
produced was as good as LFS 3.x ?

I am using a 2.0 derivative (and have built numerous 3.x versions). So
far, stability has been great because only GOOD versions of packages
have been used. I dont want to change that.
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message

More information about the lfs-dev mailing list